LjSnUo
Varsity
Dipset all day
Posts: 936
|
Post by LjSnUo on Jun 12, 2005 11:19:48 GMT -5
No everyones been intrested before its just nobody wanted to do the work and it doesnt sem like Stephen likes the idea.
|
|
Jami
All-Conference
Posts: 2,723
|
Post by Jami on Jun 12, 2005 13:09:15 GMT -5
I don't see a problem with Mudd's dynasty still being on top of the NCAAF section, especially since there hasn't been a lot of new long-lasting NCAAF dynasties that are worthy of that spot. And like someone else said, it's good that it's at the top of both the NCAAF ratings and the total hits rankings because that's the first site that many will see, and that site is considered the pinnacle of DC.
|
|
|
|
Post by robino2001 on Jun 12, 2005 13:16:08 GMT -5
1) you're not locked out of the board if you were once on it.... pm me if you need the password again.... he was wondering why there is no activity on it
2) lets wait for the redesign to be implemented for the induction policy/process to begin
3) lets remember stephen's wife had/will have a baby this past/coming week, so be a little patient for the immediate future
|
|
nafsder2007
All-Conference
Teh P@ncakes God
Return to Glory?
Posts: 2,256
|
Post by nafsder2007 on Jun 12, 2005 13:36:04 GMT -5
Nope, we're locked out. It doesn't ask for a password. When we click the link, it says "you do not have permission to enter this board." I think something either happened when v4 was put up, or when we changed the password.
|
|
|
|
Post by robino2001 on Jun 12, 2005 13:41:34 GMT -5
Nope, we're locked out. It doesn't ask for a password. When we click the link, it says "you do not have permission to enter this board." I think something either happened when v4 was put up, or when we changed the password. yeah, DB pointed it out to me and figured out the reason... i don't have access to change it, but I'll relay it to stephen so he can take care of it i just figured it was fine because bama and I get the password screen.... i'll let him know though |
|
|
|
Post by SilverChaosVII on Jun 13, 2005 13:44:24 GMT -5
Your preaching to the chior on this Cerrano. The reason a Hall of Fame never got off the ground was because no one could decide the rules to get in. Would it be a vote by all or just some members, how long would it have to last, ect. Then we just gave up on the headache of it all. Well, maybe we can change our ways with this a little and actually get something done for once. Edit* Nafsder, most of it got left on the board I think more because of time issues and of course all of y'all being locked out of the redesign board didn't help either. What I hope will happen is as we get the redesign up and rolling, the other changes will come later on. Maybe instead of voting it could work by numbers. The rules... 1. Dynasty must be (have been) active ten franchise years or over one normal year. 2. Dynasty must have over one hundred votes 3. Rating must be 9.5 or above I don't know, something like that but in more depth. |
|
|
|
Post by Cerrano39 on Jun 13, 2005 13:52:32 GMT -5
Maybe instead of voting it could work by numbers. The rules... 1. Dynasty must be (have been) active ten franchise years or over one normal year. 2. Dynasty must have over one hundred votes 3. Rating must be 9.5 or above I don't know, something like that but in more depth. The only dynasty to fit those requirements is Mudd's... |
|
|
|
Post by JacktheRipper on Jun 13, 2005 14:00:37 GMT -5
Ten years is a little too much in my mind and you won't see anyone play over a year because the new game comes out every year.
So what I'm thinking is you must play five years to be eligable. The ratings aren't a big deal really because if it's not good, they won't get voted in. Voting is really the best way to decide, because ratings just don't work well enough for that and well it gives everyone an opinion.
Something like that anyway I think would be the way to go.
|
|
Jami
All-Conference
Posts: 2,723
|
Post by Jami on Jun 13, 2005 17:14:39 GMT -5
The duration of the dynasty is what has caused the whole HOF thing to get tripped up multiple times...I think 5-10 years could be a little much, depending on the sport, and depending how in-depth the person goes with "extra" things (stats, standings, awards races, mag articles, etc.). I'd be one to say that the duration cutoff should be around 2-3 years, because by then, everyone knows if it's a special dynasty on the site or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cerrano39 on Jun 13, 2005 17:23:16 GMT -5
Ya, I mean, how many baseball, basketball, hockey dyansties are going to go for more than 1 season? Very few.
|
|
|
|
Post by JacktheRipper on Jun 13, 2005 17:41:14 GMT -5
Ya, I mean, how many baseball, basketball, hockey dyansties are going to go for more than 1 season? Very few. Of course there has to be a standard for different types of sports. There are 162 games per baseball season for instance, compared to 13 at most in a college football season, so what would be 3 years in college could be 1/2 a year for baseball or something. |
|
|
|
Post by allstarmike2k5 on Jun 13, 2005 19:12:32 GMT -5
yay one of my posts is actually not ending up a flame war
|
|
|
|
Post by ucrossed23 on Jun 13, 2005 19:25:40 GMT -5
I dissapear for a little while and when i come back i see the same things being discussed on the forums. But whats is sad is that nothing ever gets done around here. Some of you im sure remember all the excitment over the redesign, at this same time last year. It was June, then July, then the release of 05. Then September now Its June again and i still see the same things. I wish DC was different but its not things get talked about forever, but i never see any change.
The HOF is a great idea to remember the past legends of DC. I dont think it should be as much of a dynasty, but more of an individual award. Theres been more than enough legendary dynasties, but i think that it should award the legendary members of DC. You get all the talk of Mudds and Leaks dynasties which were incredible. But think of the people behind those. Leak has had a bagfull of great dynasties, along with his contribution to the site. Then you have the members like Jake, Jeff, myself, Austin, Jami, and a few others that made DC what it is today.
|
|
|
|
Post by BstnRdSx on Jun 13, 2005 19:28:50 GMT -5
I think you forgot Bstn and his sexyness.
|
|
nafsder2007
All-Conference
Teh P@ncakes God
Return to Glory?
Posts: 2,256
|
Post by nafsder2007 on Jun 13, 2005 19:50:25 GMT -5
Don't worry James...change is coming. I've seen proof.
|
|
|
|
Post by JacktheRipper on Jun 13, 2005 19:54:55 GMT -5
Don't worry James...change is coming. I've seen proof. He's actually correct, because I've actually seen the re-design. It is coming and around July, and the HOF is just something we are going to put in it. |
|
|
|
Post by ucrossed23 on Jun 14, 2005 13:28:44 GMT -5
Don't worry James...change is coming. I've seen proof. He's actually correct, because I've actually seen the re-design. It is coming and around July, and the HOF is just something we are going to put in it. Well that is good to hear. But i really think that the idea i had for it being the individual instead of the dynasty would make a lot of the porblems a lot easier. Then you dont have to worry about dynatsy length and all the other complications |
|
LjSnUo
Varsity
Dipset all day
Posts: 936
|
Post by LjSnUo on Jun 14, 2005 13:31:42 GMT -5
I agree james, prolly just a good idea to do people not teams.
|
|
|
|
Post by JacktheRipper on Jun 14, 2005 14:00:07 GMT -5
People, not dynasties there's a new twist and an interesting one at that. I don't see any problems with it, at least not obvious ones, so it's definatly something we should really look into in the coming weeks.
|
|
|
|
Post by ucrossed23 on Jun 14, 2005 14:44:55 GMT -5
People, not dynasties there's a new twist and an interesting one at that. I don't see any problems with it, at least not obvious ones, so it's definatly something we should really look into in the coming weeks. Just because i was gone for a little while doesnt mean things have changed with me..... of course im gonna have a ground breaking idea  |
|
