Sportsbuck, I found Someone Better Then Dixon

[wiskyfootball]

I started a dynasty as Maryland for some reason and recruited the #20 something player in the nation, a halfback, ranked like 3rd at the HB position. He came out as an 80 and started over a guy rated two points higher than he. Started every single game of his career, sadly never won a Heisman and we never made it to the NC, but he had one hell of a career. I take that back he was injured for like four weeks his senior season and that cut short a possible Heisman.

Freshman - 246 Carries 1368 Yards 15 TD, 105 YPG
Sophomore - 306 Carries 1774 Yards 22 TD, 136 YPG
Junior - 361 Carries 2099 Yards 21 TD, 150 YPG
Senior - 80 Carries 551 Yards 6 TD, 138 YPG (played just three games) Figure about 320 Carries 2204 Yards 24 TD if he played all the games.


Overall had 5729 rushing yards to go along with 64 TD's. Not a bad career, want to know the worst part? No Heisman, No NC, No 99 OVR rating.

[D-Mac]

dixon is still better.

[sep]

Well since Dixon hasnt even played more than one year, the halfback is better at this point. But Dixon has way more potential for sure.

[Sportsbuck]

Right now, I'd take the tailback over Dixon, because of the proven production. But, like Sep says, Dixon hasn't even played a full year yet.

[USN]

replace 'then' with 'than' and you're title will make sense