|
|
Post by allstarmike2k5 on Jul 6, 2005 1:07:05 GMT -5
I thought maybe instead of doing just one dynasty...do a conference like ACC and put down all the good ACC dynasty's...That would give more recignition for some of the lesser popular dynasty's
|
|
|
|
Post by cubs128 on Jul 6, 2005 1:18:41 GMT -5
Yeah, but some of those lesser popular dynasties might not be deserving of a featured dynasty.
|
|
|
|
Post by JacktheRipper on Jul 6, 2005 1:28:41 GMT -5
The idea though is a featured dynasty, meaning it is really good. Just look at Muddspur's, that's what is suppose to be a featured dynasty, it has to be good. If a dynasty is really good, it get's popular. So the featured dynasty is for obviously the good ones.
So I personally don't think this is a great idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by allstarmike2k5 on Jul 6, 2005 1:46:25 GMT -5
So are you thinking more of just a list of the featured dynasty's? Like ones that are voted upon?
|
|
ajrancid
Varsity
It?s all about that U baby?
Posts: 446
|
Post by ajrancid on Jul 6, 2005 7:32:55 GMT -5
I don't see why there is really any need for change like this. If anything is done then it should just be made like the NFL section (add in a Dynasty Review) but besides that the section seems fine to me.
Also what would be the point in having the best dynasty for each conference? Since nearly every major member is doing the SEC (besides the FSU page and a couple of Fighting Irish pages) and there probally won't be a good Big East dynasty etc.
|
|
Dash
All-Conference
Go Illini
Posts: 1,146
|
Post by Dash on Jul 6, 2005 10:58:49 GMT -5
well I know for sure I wont be in the SEC because for one I dont like the SEC and two I try to take smaller schools if possible abd bring them up in rankings and have fun with smaller schools so I know for sure I wont be in the SEC, maybe Big 10, or Big East, or Big 12 but not SEC
|
|
