|
|
Post by NoT25hAbY on Nov 14, 2004 12:19:12 GMT -5
Suppse you had the option to create your team due to the way you run a game. Would you chose a Strong Passer to lead you into victory through the air(ex. Manning), A Strong Runner to lead you into victory with every rushing milestone he reaches(ex. Tomlinson), or Strong Defense that holds together a lackluster offense(ex. Tampa Bay).
J/ stiring conversation
|
|
|
|
Post by ucrossed23 on Nov 14, 2004 12:24:05 GMT -5
Well being a UF and a STL fan i gotta go with Strong Passser, its just in my blood being raised in the Spurrier era
|
|
JETS393
All-Conference
Posts: 1,491
|
Post by JETS393 on Nov 14, 2004 12:44:13 GMT -5
defense wins championships. i always love watching teams air it out but it has very little success from what ive seen in real life. anyone can get 1000 yards rushing as long as they stay healthy so why build around a 1500-yard back when you can just get an average 1000-yard back.
|
|
|
|
Post by NoT25hAbY on Nov 14, 2004 12:52:42 GMT -5
When you look at Barry Sanders. They failed in basing a team around a RunningBack, but only because they didn't support a decent cast. Look at Dan Marino, and they didn't suport a decent cast to help out. Defense's do win Championships, sure, if you can stop a team from scoring, all you have to do is score and you win haha.
I'd base my team around a pasing QB, because that opens up the runninggame, and with a decent Defense, you have the game. There's something appealing that makes the NFL the NFL when the QB is the best player in the game. Michael Vick is a tribute to the new era of life, but is an insult to all that's been the NFL up to this point.
There will never be anything better than seeing a QB lead his team into victory. Old shool ass kicks haha.
|
|
|
|
Post by sixerz2k4 on Nov 14, 2004 14:55:51 GMT -5
I chose rusher, but there's an exception. In fantasy drafts, I always go for a great runningback, and then stock up on defensive players. QB's aren't needing to heave the ball 70 yards now that West Coast offenses are being popularized. So I'd like a dominant rusher first, then get an above-average defense, and have an average passer,
|
|
LjSnUo
Varsity
Dipset all day
Posts: 936
|
Post by LjSnUo on Nov 15, 2004 18:33:16 GMT -5
id take a strong D any day over a good offense, the offense cant be that bad, can it?
|
|
nafsder2007
All-Conference
Teh P@ncakes God
Return to Glory?
Posts: 2,256
|
Post by nafsder2007 on Nov 15, 2004 21:12:02 GMT -5
Well, I'd take strong passer...more fun to watch. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by stewaat on Nov 18, 2004 18:12:53 GMT -5
I love a great defense...Panthers. Next year...  |
|
|
|
Post by Freak93 on Nov 18, 2004 18:13:50 GMT -5
Good Strong D for me.  |
|
bearcat
All-Conference
Posts: 3,276
|
Post by bearcat on Nov 18, 2004 22:17:34 GMT -5
I think having a strong D is pretty important. Pretty much with the WC offense, all you need is a solid passer with decent accuracy and a back that can get 60-70 yards a game. If you can get that many yards on the ground with one RB, he'll get 1,000 yds over the whole season (barring injury)
|
|
