|
|
Post by not2shaby on Apr 30, 2005 11:13:56 GMT -5
I understand silverchaos and Bama has one running, but I must say, the Raiders have alot to work with on their site. A member like AJRancid would have a joy ride with a Dynasty like them.
I mean, like all out HTML and such like some teams do, that'd be sickening. Player Profiles even look kool. I am looking forward to one of them, or a newbie to come out with a good Raiders chise soon.
|
|
Da Rafeter
Varsity
If you don't try... You're guaranteed to Fail
Posts: 728
|
Post by Da Rafeter on Apr 30, 2005 11:26:23 GMT -5
I know what you mean and such, but I think the Raiders are a really horrible team to go, except from Charles Woodson. The new Raiders would be horrible to go, there layout would be cool but layouts don't make dynastys,
But you'd have to spend a while on rebuilding this team
|
|
|
|
Post by not2shaby on Apr 30, 2005 11:35:36 GMT -5
In 2006, you have Lamont Jordon and Randy Moss...
All Kerry Collins has to do is toss it up and Moss or Porter will grab it. Jordan can run the ball. You have Napolean Harris, Phillip Buchanon, and Charles Woodson on defense. I'd say that's a good team to play with, but oh well.
Most DC members like to rebuild neways...
|
|
|
|
Post by detroitbasketball on Apr 30, 2005 11:44:11 GMT -5
Ah, Napolean Harris and Philip Buchanon got traded.
|
|
|
|
Post by not2shaby on Apr 30, 2005 11:45:46 GMT -5
that's right... my bad
In that case, you can still rebuild lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Cerrano39 on Apr 30, 2005 11:53:59 GMT -5
They also got the best, most versatile, game-changing defensive lineman in the league.
Yes, that Warren Sapp.
|
|
Da Rafeter
Varsity
If you don't try... You're guaranteed to Fail
Posts: 728
|
Post by Da Rafeter on Apr 30, 2005 12:03:16 GMT -5
They also got the best, most versatile, game-changing defensive lineman in the league. Yes, that Warren Sapp. Yes!, the Sapp man can do anything now, except from play  The Raiders will also have to trade away Charles Woodson due to him accepting the franchise tag that garentees him 10.5 Million, so they won't have him either, Also, there in CAP hell, that means you have to cut your main players first before you rebuild, I think the Raider franchise is in really bad shape just now, no offense to the RaiderNation ;D |
|
|
|
Post by JacktheRipper on Apr 30, 2005 12:53:29 GMT -5
Yeah, uh that's why I picked them for the re-building.
Oh and for what I'm doing, it's more just an outlet for me to do some writing and try some things, to keep me in practice come July. They are a really fun team to play with after a season. All you need are a few draft picks and a decent back and bam you are set up.
|
|
|
|
Post by SilverChaosVII on May 1, 2005 0:04:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by not2shaby on May 1, 2005 0:17:23 GMT -5
You know I read both of your Raiders Cise. I'm just saying if not even you guys, i'm suprised nobodys done something HTML wise with the Raiders. They have quite the establishment online. That's every members dream. To pick a team with most the HTML made for you lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by JacktheRipper on May 1, 2005 0:23:17 GMT -5
I noticed that when I went to their site, it was crazy.
You have a photo gallery, banners, history and just a bunch of stuff. I thought it was a gold mine for stuff, but I just happned to want to focus on writing.
Your right though, it'd be an easy starting chise for any new member.
|
|
|
|
Post by SilverChaosVII on May 1, 2005 0:31:47 GMT -5
I know, I was just playing around ;D
|
|
ajrancid
Varsity
It?s all about that U baby?
Posts: 446
|
Post by ajrancid on May 1, 2005 4:36:45 GMT -5
It's always a really bad idea to start a dynasty with a team mainly because of how their site looks. And if anyone is going to do that they should at least do the Falcons since their site is awesome (plus they are a much better team to go than the Raiders).
I was looking at all the NFL sites and the New York Jets one was the only really bad one imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by kgcassellspree on May 1, 2005 8:06:40 GMT -5
I was actually looking at the Falcons site a few days ago and I was thinking of doing one along with my Vikings one.
|
|
Loki
All-Conference
Posts: 3,501
|
Post by Loki on May 1, 2005 11:09:42 GMT -5
[quote author=[aj rancid] link=board=madden&thread=1114877636&start=12#0 date=1114940205]It's always a really bad idea to start a dynasty with a team mainly because of how their site looks. And if anyone is going to do that they should at least do the Falcons since their site is awesome (plus they are a much better team to go than the Raiders).
I was looking at all the NFL sites and the New York Jets one was the only really bad one imo.[/quote]
Lots of people pick teams that they can rebuild and make much better though because it makes for good stories and makes it harder to do well. I know I like a challenge so I'd never do one on a team like the Patriots (though Cerrano's is great), the Eagles, or the Colts, or those types of teams.
|
|
|
|
Post by not2shaby on May 1, 2005 11:48:30 GMT -5
[quote author=[aj rancid] link=board=madden&thread=1114877636&start=12#0 date=1114940205]It's always a really bad idea to start a dynasty with a team mainly because of how their site looks.[/quote]
It's not based on how their site looks. People want Magazines. They want flashy HTML. They want the extras that put a Dynasty over the top. Every player on the Raiders has his own profile you can take the HTML out of, and that's a DC members dream.
I'm saying there are alot of members who want to have a great site, and the Raiders have a few things most sites dont.
It has nothing to do with how the site looks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cerrano39 on May 2, 2005 8:08:03 GMT -5
People want Magazines. They want flashy HTML. They want the extras that put a Dynasty over the top. Looks like someone is giving into peer pressure |
|
|
|
Post by not2shaby on May 2, 2005 21:47:59 GMT -5
Well it's no easy being 17. everyone smokin and drinkin. I told them I didn't want to, but they kept hasseln me. That was untill I pulled out my Capital One!
No, I'm just saying that the majority of users on the site thrive of other peoples HTML. figured i'd get the word out about the Raiders page.
Instead, I offended a few members, started an issue over if their a good team or bad team, and was considerd "giving into peer pressure". haha.
|
|
;D 
