Post by McGahee on Oct 12, 2005 20:16:36 GMT -5
Well let's see Steve Nash's numbers in his last year in Big D, shall we.
--He scored 14.5 PPG (1 point less than this past year, and just a tad less than what he normally had)
--Had 8.8 APG (A career high that was beat last year, but certainly not qualifying as a dying player)
--3 RPG (.1 off of career high, and higher than in Phoenix)
--47% shooter (4th highest of his career, later broken next year)
--91% FT (career high, not beaten next year)
So as you can see, the only difference was a couple more assists per game, and he won the MVP award. And to correct you, Nash was replaced because there wasn't enough cap room for him because of all the additions made that off season, in addition to the high salaries of Dirk and Finley beforehand. So with that spurt of 2 more assists per game, Nash is the MVP with 15/11/2, after being 14/8/3.
Now Sam Cassell. Last year's stats...
--13.5 PPG (4th lowest of career and lowest since 96-97 season)
--5.1 APG (lowest since 98-99 season)
--2.7 RPG (lowest since 98-99 season)
--.61 SPG (lowest of career)
--46.4 FG% (2nd lowest since 98-99 season)
--26.2 3 PT% (lowest sicne 98-99 season)
So as you can see, Cassell posted crap numbers. Nash put up much better numbers, and put up career highs, showing that he was at the peak of his game, which would have had more people expect this out of the Suns if they also assumed Amare would rebound from his missed-expectations season last year, Joe Johnson and Q being aggressive shooters, and Shawn Marion staying healthy. Anyways, Cassell had career lows in many categories and had his worst season in 7 years on the others. Obviously, if you think Cassell would improve like Nash would, that would mean putting up numbers that were worse than Nash's last season IN DALLAS.
Where are you getting this Cassell=Nash bull honkey?
--He scored 14.5 PPG (1 point less than this past year, and just a tad less than what he normally had)
--Had 8.8 APG (A career high that was beat last year, but certainly not qualifying as a dying player)
--3 RPG (.1 off of career high, and higher than in Phoenix)
--47% shooter (4th highest of his career, later broken next year)
--91% FT (career high, not beaten next year)
So as you can see, the only difference was a couple more assists per game, and he won the MVP award. And to correct you, Nash was replaced because there wasn't enough cap room for him because of all the additions made that off season, in addition to the high salaries of Dirk and Finley beforehand. So with that spurt of 2 more assists per game, Nash is the MVP with 15/11/2, after being 14/8/3.
Now Sam Cassell. Last year's stats...
--13.5 PPG (4th lowest of career and lowest since 96-97 season)
--5.1 APG (lowest since 98-99 season)
--2.7 RPG (lowest since 98-99 season)
--.61 SPG (lowest of career)
--46.4 FG% (2nd lowest since 98-99 season)
--26.2 3 PT% (lowest sicne 98-99 season)
So as you can see, Cassell posted crap numbers. Nash put up much better numbers, and put up career highs, showing that he was at the peak of his game, which would have had more people expect this out of the Suns if they also assumed Amare would rebound from his missed-expectations season last year, Joe Johnson and Q being aggressive shooters, and Shawn Marion staying healthy. Anyways, Cassell had career lows in many categories and had his worst season in 7 years on the others. Obviously, if you think Cassell would improve like Nash would, that would mean putting up numbers that were worse than Nash's last season IN DALLAS.
Where are you getting this Cassell=Nash bull honkey?