|
|
Post by Freak93 on May 5, 2007 9:44:40 GMT -5
I can't find the link to it but the writer suggested that kick in goals should count. I think that is BS. Thoughts?  |
|
TJFOR3
All-Conference
Posts: 1,785
|
Post by TJFOR3 on May 5, 2007 9:49:03 GMT -5
I don't think it would make much difference at all. I actually think it might be a good idea, because it would take away some contriversey (sp?).
|
|
McGahee
All-Conference
Raaraaraa It's A Boy
Posts: 3,684
|
Post by McGahee on May 5, 2007 9:52:40 GMT -5
Stupid. The whole cool thing about the game is that you have to move on 1/8 inch blades and whack a puck with a thin stick. The hardest part in the game is getting your stick on the puck, so why should the NHL let lesser-skilled players get an advantage.
The whole controversy aspect is BS. The only thing that's really come up because of this was the NYR-Buff "no goal" and that was replayed hundreds of times by the officials. Replay is what ends controversy, not changing the rules to soccer.
|
|
TJFOR3
All-Conference
Posts: 1,785
|
Post by TJFOR3 on May 5, 2007 9:55:36 GMT -5
Yeah but some times it is dumb. I remember in the Penguins series when Crosby got a goal called back when it went off his knee and in after he was tripped and fell down. I thought that that should've been a goal. I think it is much harder to kick the puck in the goal that shoot it anyways.
It can go both ways though...
|
|
|
|
Post by PrimadonnaPictures on May 5, 2007 11:51:59 GMT -5
I like how people bitch about the puck getting kicked in or not kicked in and the rangers still won.... who cares?
|
|
sprew8
All-Conference
Go Habs Go !
Posts: 1,675
|
Post by sprew8 on May 5, 2007 12:45:17 GMT -5
the problem with this rule is the interpretation of , did he or did he not do a kicking motion to get the puck in the net or whas it accidental.
I think they should either allowed all goals or denied all of them. No more interpretation.
|
|
